4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kartseva v. Department of State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kartseva v. Department of State Anchor | green | “formally or automatically excludes” | 5 |
| 2 | Kartseva v. Department of State | green | “interferes with her constitutionally protected right to follow a chosen trade or profession.” | 3 |
| 3 | Kartseva v. Department of State | green | “formally or automatically excluded” | 3 |
| 4 | New Vision Photography Program, Inc. v. District of Columbia | green | “a plaintiff must allege that (1) the government deprived her of a liberty or property interest to which she had a legitimate claim of entitlement, and (2) that the procedures attendant upon that deprivation were constitutionally insufficient.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.