3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kottmyer v. Maas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kottmyer v. Maas Anchor | green | “accept as true legal conclusions or unwarranted factual inferences.” | 6 |
| 2 | Kottmyer v. Maas | green | “it must appear beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” | 5 |
| 3 | Dr. Dale Thurman v. Pfizer, Inc. | green | “a district court considering a defendant's motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6) must construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and accept the plaintiffs allegations as true.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.