3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rhoda Grizzell v. City of Columbus Division of Police.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rhoda Grizzell v. City of Columbus Division of Police Anchor | green | “direct evidence is evidence that proves the existence of a fact without requiring any inferences.” | 5 |
| 2 | Coulson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. | green | “the direct evidence standard essentially requires an admission in some form by the employer that it relied on the disability in making an employment decision.” | 5 |
| 3 | Rhoda Grizzell v. City of Columbus Division of Police | green | “evidence that proves the existence of a fact without requiring any inferences.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.