3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moses v. Payne.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moses v. Payne Anchor | green | “squarely address the issue in the case' or establish a legal 15 principle that 'clearly extends' to a new context to the extent required by the supreme court in 16 . . . recent decisions” | 5 |
| 2 | Frantz v. Hazey | green | “under the 'reasonable application clause,' a federal habeas court may grant the writ if 9 the state court identifies the correct governing legal principle from the court's decisions but 10 unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of the prisoner's case.” | 5 |
| 3 | Kristopher C. Edwards v. A. Lamarque, Warden | green | “there is reason to think some other 2 explanation for the state court's decision is more likely.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.