2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Darrell L. Burrell v. Dr. Pepper/seven Up Bottling Group, Inc. Dr. Pepper/seven Up Bottling Group, L.P..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darrell L. Burrell v. Dr. Pepper/seven Up Bottling Group, Inc. Dr. Pepper/seven Up Bottling Group, L.P. Anchor | green | “is 'genuine' if the evidence is sufficient for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the non-moving party.” | 10 |
| 2 | Bluebonnet Hotel Ventures, L.L.C. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | green | “the non-movant must go beyond the pleadings and present specific facts indicating a genuine issue for trial.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.