3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Barnett v. Mark Luttrell, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Barnett v. Mark Luttrell, Jr. Anchor | green | “contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. David Sharp | green | “the positive indication by the canine was sufficient to establish probable cause for the presence of a controlled substance to justify the warrantless search of the vehicle.” | 4 |
| 3 | Taras Nykoriak v. Lena Wileczek | green | “the positive indication by the canine was sufficient to establish probable cause for the presence of a controlled substance to justify the warrantless search of the vehicle.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.