6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 580 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board Anchor | green | “the substantiality of evidence must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.” | 292 |
| 2 | Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board | green | “substantiality of the evidence must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.” | 118 |
| 3 | Dupont Teijin Films Usa, Lp v. United States | green | “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 100 |
| 4 | United States v. Eurodif S. A. | green | “interpretation governs in the absence of unambiguous statutory language to the contrary or unreasonable resolution of language that is ambiguous.” | 42 |
| 5 | United States v. Great American Insurance | green | “it is well established that arguments that are not appropriately developed in a party's briefing may be deemed waived.” | 15 |
| 6 | Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc. | green | “unsupported by substantial evidence on the record, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.