2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. International Paper Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. International Paper Co. Anchor | green | “if a contract is unambiguous on its face, its proper construction is a question of law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. | green | “party who asserts the existence of an implied-in-fact covenant bears a heavy burden.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.