4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Allien.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Allien Anchor | green | “there is little difference as far as the constitution is concerned between permitting prior inconsistent statements to be used only for impeachment purposes, and permitting them to be used for substantive purposes as well.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Cousin | green | “to admit the fact and has failed distinctly to do so,” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Everidge | green | “a reviewing court must find beyond a reasonable doubt that excluded evidence could not have affected the jury's verdict for the error to be harmless.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Owunta | neutral | “attacking the victim's credibility was crucial to the defendant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.