2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Babcock v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Babcock v. State Anchor | green | “summary judgment exists to examine the sufficiency of legal claims and narrow issues, not as an unfair substitute for trial.” | 8 |
| 2 | Barnes v. McLendon | green | “there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.