2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc. Anchor | green | “the possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency's finding from being supported by substantial evidence.” | 10 |
| 2 | Stone v. Traylor Brothers, Inc. | green | “clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence on the whole record.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.