2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Appel v. Berkman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Appel v. Berkman Anchor | green | “under delaware law, when a board chooses to disclose a course of events or to discuss a specific subject, it has long been understood that it cannot do so in a materially misleading way, by disclosing only part of the story, and leaving the reader with a distorted impression.” | 5 |
| 2 | In re Pure Resources, Inc., Shareholders Litigation | green | “when a document ventures into certain subjects, it must do so in a manner that is materially complete and unbiased by the omission of material facts.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.