3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stock-Growers of America v. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stock-Growers of America v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Anchor | green | “this standard of review is highly deferential, presuming the agency action to be valid and affirming the agency action if a reasonable basis exists for its decision.” | 5 |
| 2 | San Joaquin River Group Authority v. National Marine Fisheries Service | green | “genuine dispute of material fact” | 5 |
| 3 | Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stock-Growers of America v. U.S. Department of Agriculture | green | “highly deferential, presuming the agency action to be valid and affirming the agency action if a reasonable basis exists for its decision.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.