4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 110 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hedges v. Musco.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hedges v. Musco Anchor | green | “where the claim over which the district court has original jurisdiction is dismissed before trial, the district court must decline to decide the pendent state claims unless considerations of judicial economy, convenience, and fairness to the parties provide an affirmative justif…” | 70 |
| 2 | Hedges v. Musco | green | “the district court must decline to decide the pendent state claims unless considerations of judicial economy, convenience, and fairness to the parties provide an affirmative justification for doing so.” | 16 |
| 3 | Hedges v. Musco | green | “unless considerations of judicial economy, convenience, and fairness to the parties provide an affirmative justification for doing so.” | 12 |
| 4 | Stehney v. Perry | green | “a federal district court may decline to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims if all federal claims are dismissed.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.