3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moody Realty Co., Inc. v. Huestis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moody Realty Co., Inc. v. Huestis Anchor | green | “the legal mechanism by which parties show their assent to be bound is through offer and acceptance.” | 7 |
| 2 | Peoples Bank of Elk Valley v. Conagra Poultry Co. | green | “must result from a meeting of the minds, must be based upon sufficient consideration, and must be sufficiently definite to be enforced.” | 4 |
| 3 | Peoples Bank of Elk Valley v. Conagra Poultry Co. | green | “in order to enforce a contract in tennessee, the contract must result from a meeting of the minds, must be based upon sufficient consideration, and must be sufficiently definite to be enforced.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.