4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alabama Power Co. v. Aldridge.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama Power Co. v. Aldridge Anchor | green | “a plaintiff must prove a causal connection between the workers' compensation claim and the subsequent discharge in order to establish a prima facie case.” | 5 |
| 2 | Spencer v. Lawson, 1991598 (Ala. 9-14-2001) | green | “materially indistinguishable from the standard by which we review a summary judgment.” | 4 |
| 3 | Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc. | green | “the plaintiff then has the burden of going forward with rebuttal evidence showing that the defendant's stated reasons” | 3 |
| 4 | Spencer v. Lawson, 1991598 (Ala. 9-14-2001) | green | “indistinguishable from the standard by which we review a summary judgment.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.