3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sweeney v. Purvis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sweeney v. Purvis Anchor | green | “the trial court has great discretion in determining whether evidence ... is relevant and whether it should be admitted or excluded.” | 5 |
| 2 | Bama's Best Party Sales, Inc. v. Tupperware, U.S., Inc. | green | “rulings on the admissibility of evidence are within the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.” | 5 |
| 3 | Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ryan | green | “bowers v. wal-mart stores, inc. , 827 so.2d 63 , 71 (ala. 2001).” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.