2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from High v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High v. State Anchor | green | “contain a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.” | 11 |
| 2 | Nichols v. State | green | “demonstrate that counsel has conscientiously examined the record and determined that the appeal is so frivolous that the appellant is not entitled to counsel on appeal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.