3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center Anchor | green | “superimposed upon the discovery rule, however, is an overall limitation upon the discovery rule's operation to a period of three years from the date of the alleged act, omission or neglect.” | 5 |
| 2 | Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Serv. | green | “the contra non valentem type of exception to prescription embodied in the discovery rule is expressly made inapplicable after three years from the alleged injury causing act, omission or neglect.” | 5 |
| 3 | Taylor v. Giddens | green | “likely to hinder the patient's inclination to sue.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.