5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cummings v. City of Waterloo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cummings v. City of Waterloo Anchor | green | “a factually insufficient complaint fails to allege sufficient facts essential to the cause of action.” | 3 |
| 2 | Davis v. Temple | green | “unless it clearly appears that no set of facts could be proven under the pleadings which would entitle the plaintiff to relief.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re Marriage of Nienhouse | green | “a party has standing to bring a constitutional challenge only if the party is able to show himself to be within the class aggrieved by the alleged unconstitutionality.” | 3 |
| 4 | In re Custody of Townsend | green | “awarding custody or visitation rights to a nonparent over the objection of a natural parent is permissible if it would be in the best interests of the child.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.