4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 109 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Monahan v. New York City Department Of Corrections.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monahan v. New York City Department Of Corrections Anchor | green | “absent evidence of undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, undue prejudice to the opposing party, or futility.” | 46 |
| 2 | Williams v. Citigroup Inc. | green | “this permissive standard is consistent with our strong preference for resolving disputes on the merits.” | 38 |
| 3 | Williams v. Citigroup Inc. | green | “strong preference for resolving disputes on the merits.” | 17 |
| 4 | Williams v. Citigroup Inc. | green | “this permissive standard is consistent with the second circuit's 'strong preference for resolving disputes on the merits.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.