4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Sulton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Sulton Anchor | green | “whether a defendant received proper credit against his fine is a question of law that we review de novo.” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Burdine | green | “to create a database of the genetic identities of recidivist criminal offenders.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Williams | green | “because defendant remained a convicted defendant following the appellate court's resolution of his appeal, the court properly allowed the state's fee request” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Sulton | green | “intended to reimburse the state for some cost incurred in the defendant's prosecution.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.