3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McKimmy v. Melling.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McKimmy v. Melling Anchor | green | “the party requesting the change of domicile has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the change is warranted.” | 7 |
| 2 | McKimmy v. Melling | green | “whether the proposed parenting-time schedule provides 'a realistic opportunity to preserve and foster the parental relationship previously enjoyed' by the nonrelocating parent.” | 4 |
| 3 | Rittershaus v. Rittershaus | green | “it is well established that the relocating parent's increased earning potential may improve a child's quality of life.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.