4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless Insurance Anchor | green | “where the appellant offers no allegations to support the possibility of amendment and no legal authority showing the viability of new causes of action, there is no basis for finding the trial court abused its discretion when it sustained the demurrer without leave to amend.” | 4 |
| 2 | Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Boyle | green | “where a demurrer is sustained without leave to amend, we must determine whether there is a reasonable probability that the complaint could have been amended to cure the defect; if so, we will conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by denying the plaintiff leave to a…” | 4 |
| 3 | Parada v. Superior Court | green | “unconscionability has procedural and substantive aspects,” | 3 |
| 4 | Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc. | green | “absent unusual circumstances, evidence that one party has overwhelming bargaining power, drafts the contract, and presents it on a take-it-or-leave-it basis is sufficient to demonstrate procedural unconscionability and require the court to reach the question of substantive uncon…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.