3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jakab v. Jakab.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jakab v. Jakab Anchor | green | “the court need not specify the weight given to each factor, but is required only to provide a clear statement as to what was decided and why.” | 6 |
| 2 | Cabot v. Cabot | green | “as we have often noted, property division is not an exact science, and the trial court has broad discretion in considering the statutory factors and fashioning an appropriate order.” | 5 |
| 3 | Goodrich v. Goodrich | green | “where the findings reasonably support the judgment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.