4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Marriage of Scanlon and Witrak.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Marriage of Scanlon and Witrak Anchor | green | “a lack of findings as to either need or ability to pay requires reversal.” | 4 |
| 2 | In re the Marriage of Scanlon | green | “a lack of findings as to either need or ability to pay requires reversal.” | 4 |
| 3 | Urbana v. Urbana | neutral | “balance the needs of the spouse seeking fees against the ability of the other spouse to pay.” | 3 |
| 4 | In re the Marriage of Urbana | green | “after considering the financial resources of both parties.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.