2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Darra Shephard.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Darra Shephard Anchor | green | “in reviewing whether a sentencing court properly calculated the guidelines range, we review the court's factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Kurt Steffen | green | “we will conclude that the ruling of the district court is clearly erroneous only when, after reviewing all the evidence, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.