3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from K.B. v. Tinsley, T..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K.B. v. Tinsley, T. Anchor | green | “in the context of a pfa order, we review the trial court's legal conclusions for an error of law or abuse of discretion.” | 5 |
| 2 | K.B. v. Tinsley, T. | green | “this court defers to the credibility determinations of the trial court as to witnesses who appeared before it.” | 5 |
| 3 | Ferri v. Ferri | green | “is defined as the greater weight of the evidence, i.e., to tip a scale slightly is the criteria or requirement for preponderance of the evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.