2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Todd R. Chazen v. Matthew Marske.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Todd R. Chazen v. Matthew Marske Anchor | green | “today's opinion avoids resolving the choice-of-law problem . . .” | 8 |
| 2 | John Worman v. Frederick Entzel | green | “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention,” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.