3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc. Anchor | green | “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.” | 7 |
| 2 | Childs v. Allen | neutral | “bears the burden of proving that the trial court abused its discretion.” | 4 |
| 3 | Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc. | green | “decision is 'manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.