3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth Bailey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth Bailey Anchor | green | “a court abuses its discretion if it acts in a manner that exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances, violates some legal principle, or ignores a material factor deserving significant weight.” | 6 |
| 2 | Ianelli v. Camino | green | “in the light most favorable to the district court's decision, 'affording every favorable inference to the prevailing party and omitting from our consideration the conflicting evidence.” | 5 |
| 3 | James L. Hyatt v. Tara M. Hyatt | green | “child support calculations are governed exclusively by statute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.