3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rogers v. ALT-A&M JV LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rogers v. ALT-A&M JV LLC Anchor | green | “evidence possessing something of substance and relevant consequence to induce the conclusion that the award was proper, furnishing a basis of fact from which the issue raised could be easily resolved.” | 10 |
| 2 | Moore v. Venture Corp. & Travelers Indemnity Co. | green | “has been so undermined by cross-examination or other evidence that it is insufficient to support its decision.” | 2 |
| 3 | Moore v. Venture Corp. & Travelers Indemnity Co. | green | “whether the evidence supporting the board's decision has been so undermined by cross-examination or other evidence that it is insufficient to support its decision.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.