2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wilber v. Curtis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilber v. Curtis Anchor | green | “it can be an abuse of discretion-if no federal claim remains-for a district court to retain jurisdiction over a pendent state law claim when that state law claim presents a substantial question of state law that is better addressed by the state courts.” | 8 |
| 2 | Delgado v. Pawtucket Police Department Ex Rel. Wunschel | green | “it can be an abuse of discretion-if no federal claim remains-for a district court to retain jurisdiction over a pendent state law claim when that state law claim presents a substantial question of state law that is better addressed by the state courts” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.