2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gloria S. Carter v. Chrysler Corporation United Auto Workers, Local 110.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gloria S. Carter v. Chrysler Corporation United Auto Workers, Local 110 Anchor | green | “all instances of harassment need not be stamped with signs of overt discrimination to be relevant under title vii if they are part of a course of conduct which is tied to evidence of discriminatory animus.” | 5 |
| 2 | O'Shea v. Yellow Technology Services, Inc. | green | “the severity and pervasiveness evaluation is particularly unsuited for summary judgment because it is 'quintessentially a question of fact” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.