2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Douglas v. California.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Douglas v. California Anchor | green | “he could not conscientiously proceed with the appeal,” | 7 |
| 2 | Fredericks v. Reincke | green | “cannot demand that the trial court find and appoint other counsel who will advise such appeal” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.