4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barhoumi v. Obama.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barhoumi v. Obama Anchor | green | “an intelligence report's reliability can be assessed by comparison to 'exogenous information” | 4 |
| 2 | Lakhdar Boumediene v. Barack Obama | green | “each unreliable when viewed alone,” | 3 |
| 3 | Lakhdar Boumediene v. Barack Obama | green | “functional rather than a formal approach and by focusing upon the actions of the individual in relation to the organization.” | 3 |
| 4 | Khan v. Obama | green | “in guantanamo habeas proceedings, the court must assess the accuracy, reliability, and credibility of each piece of evidence presented by the parties in the context of the evidence as a whole” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.