6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 569 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Frr, III.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Frr, III Anchor | green | “whether the trial court's findings, made under a clear and convincing standard, are supported by a preponderance of the evidence.” | 138 |
| 2 | In Re Audrey S. | green | “the relevancy and weight to be given each factor depends on the unique facts of each case.” | 104 |
| 3 | In Re Drinnon | green | “this right is not absolute and parental rights may be terminated if there is clear and convincing evidence justifying such termination under the applicable statute.” | 99 |
| 4 | Keisling v. Keisling | green | “parents have a fundamental constitutional interest in the care and custody of their children under both the united states and tennessee constitutions.” | 95 |
| 5 | In Re Carrington H. | green | “persons seeking to terminate parental rights must prove all the elements of their case by clear and convincing evidence,” | 67 |
| 6 | In Re Carrington H. | green | “the relevancy and weight to be given each factor depends on the unique facts of each case.” | 66 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.