3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ramos-Santiago v. United Parcel Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramos-Santiago v. United Parcel Service Anchor | green | “some showing in the record, other than the result obtained, that the arbitrator knew the law and expressly disregarded it.” | 6 |
| 2 | Ortiz-Espinosa v. BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, Inc. | green | “hear claims of factual or legal error by an arbitrator as an appellate court does in reviewing decisions of lower courts,” | 4 |
| 3 | Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Fenyk | green | “the arbitrator recognized the applicable law, but ignored it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.