4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard M. Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard M. Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Anchor | green | “a plaintiff nonetheless can plead himself out of court by alleging facts that foreclose a finding of diligence or extraordinary circumstances, both of which are required for equitable tolling.” | 4 |
| 2 | Abb Turbo Systems Ag v. Turbousa, Inc. | green | “federal rules of civil procedure 8(a)(2) and 12(b)(6) together establish a notice-pleading standard that is applied, in a context-specific manner, with the recognition that the imposition of litigation costs must be justified at the threshold by the presence of factual allegatio…” | 3 |
| 3 | Magluta v. United States | green | “a party is bound by the admissions in his pleadings.” | 3 |
| 4 | TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. Ruiz | green | “a party is bound by the admissions in his pleadings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.