4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Defenders Of Wildlife v. Norton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Defenders Of Wildlife v. Norton Anchor | green | “significant portion of its range” | 5 |
| 2 | Defenders Of Wildlife v. Norton | green | “if there are major geographical areas in which it is no longer viable but once was.” | 4 |
| 3 | Defenders Of Wildlife v. Norton | green | “a species can be extinct 'throughout ... a significant portion of its range' if there are major geographical areas in which it is no longer viable but once was.” | 2 |
| 4 | Defenders of Wildlife v. Secretary, United States Department of the Interior | green | “effect of rendering the phrase significant portion of its range superfluous.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.