4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas P. Davis and Cathy M. Davis v. G.N. Mortgage Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas P. Davis and Cathy M. Davis v. G.N. Mortgage Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Anchor | green | “based on nothing more than mere speculation” | 4 |
| 2 | MAZ Partners LP v. PHC, Inc. | green | “summary judgment in the face of requests for additional discovery is appropriate only where such discovery would be 'fruitless' with respect to the proof of a viable claim” | 3 |
| 3 | Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives | green | “well-reasoned and essentially 'on all fours' with this case” | 3 |
| 4 | Smith v. OSF Healthcare Sys. | green | “the question is not whether the plan committees are doing their jobs well or excessively delegating their authority, but rather whether the structure satisfies the requirements of the church plan definition.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.