4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Busso-Estopellan v. Hon. mroz/state.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Busso-Estopellan v. Hon. mroz/state Anchor | green | “an error of law committed in reaching a discretionary conclusion may, however, constitute an abuse of discretion.” | 5 |
| 2 | State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner | green | “evidence presented at the suppression hearing and view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling.” | 3 |
| 3 | Carrillo v. Houser | green | “unequivocally manifest assent to the testing by words or conduct” | 3 |
| 4 | State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner | green | “we consider the evidence presented at the suppression hearing and view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.