2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robbins v. Robbins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robbins v. Robbins Anchor | green | “when dealing with discretionary decisions, only 'when reasonable jurists could not differ can we say an abuse of discretion has occurred.” | 10 |
| 2 | Smith v. Smith | green | “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, granting it the benefit of any reasonable inferences.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.