2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Larry Tate v. Thomas J. Dart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Larry Tate v. Thomas J. Dart Anchor | green | “illinois courts analyze ihra claims under a framework that is practically indistinguishable from the ada framework.” | 6 |
| 2 | Lori L. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, James R. Klauser, Lee Martinson | green | “the duty of reasonable ac- commodation is satisfied when the employer does what is necessary to enable the disabled worker to work in reasonable comfort.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.