3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marttila v. City of Lynchburg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marttila v. City of Lynchburg Anchor | green | “an order conflicts with a transcript of related proceedings.” | 6 |
| 2 | Rose v. Commonwealth | green | “speaks through its orders and those orders are presumed to accurately reflect what transpired” | 4 |
| 3 | McBride v. Commonwealth | green | “we are not restricted to the precise, technical wording of a court's order when other evidence in the record clearly establishes that the court had a different intent.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.