4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Seattle v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Seattle v. Williams Anchor | green | “statutory writs should be granted sparingly when used as a method of review of interlocutory decisions of courts of limited jurisdiction.” | 4 |
| 2 | Foster v. King County | green | “this is an extraordinary remedy reserved for extraordinary situations.” | 3 |
| 3 | Jacobsen v. State | green | “summary judgment is a procedural device designed to avoid the time and expense of a trial when no trial is necessary.” | 3 |
| 4 | Commanda v. Cary | green | “since the ralj provides a 'speedy and adequate remedy at law' in most instances, we conclude that statutory writs should be granted sparingly when used as a method of review of interlocutory decisions of courts of limited jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.