3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wfse v. Ofm.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wfse v. Ofm Anchor | green | “the purpose of this limitation is to effectuate the rule that the appellate court engages in the same inquiry as the trial court.” | 6 |
| 2 | Mithoug v. Apollo Radio | green | “called to the attention of the trial court” | 4 |
| 3 | Mithoug v. Apollo Radio | green | “on review of an order granting or denying a motion for summary judgment the appellate court will consider only evidence and issues called to the attention of the trial court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.