4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Giles v. Hill Lewis Marce.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Giles v. Hill Lewis Marce Anchor | green | “a motion for judgment on the pleadings . . . tests the sufficiency of the complaint, and judgment should be entered for the defendant if the complaint fails to state a claim for relief.” | 4 |
| 2 | Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department | green | “a probation officer cannot assert for immunity unless the officer is acting pursuant to or in aid of the directions of the court.” | 3 |
| 3 | Giles v. Hill Lewis Marce | green | “a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to arizona rule of civil procedure 12(c) tests the sufficiency of the complaint, and judgment should be entered for the defendant if the complaint fails to state a claim for relief.” | 3 |
| 4 | Giles v. Hill Lewis Marce | green | “tests the sufficiency of the complaint, and judgment should be entered for the defendant if the complaint fails to state a claim for relief.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.