3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pineda v. Masonry Construction, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pineda v. Masonry Construction, Inc. Anchor | green | “specific and . . . address only those portions of the proposed findings to which the party objects.” | 6 |
| 2 | Pineda v. Masonry Construction, Inc. | green | “address only those portions of the proposed findings to which the party objects.” | 4 |
| 3 | Silva v. Peninsula Hotel | green | “that a party fails to properly object if she 'makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates her original arguments.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.