2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 89 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walker v. Schult.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker v. Schult Anchor | green | “a district court deciding a motion to dismiss may consider factual allegations made by a pro se party in his papers opposing the motion.” | 85 |
| 2 | Davila v. Lang | green | “because is proceeding pro se, the court may consider new facts raised in opposition papers to the extent that they are consistent with the complaint, treating the new factual allegations as amending the original complaint.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.